I’ve been meaning to write my insight into the latest trends for directories and their owners for a while. Over the last few months, I’ve been noticing good and bad trends occurring in and around directories. I’m going to cover a few topics that I’d like to voice my opinion about and I’d like to know your thoughts as well…
Last Pagerank Update
Many of us were greeted well with the last pr update, some of course better than others. We saw a large increase in quality, Pagerank 6 directories (Such as eWebPages.org and Romow). However, with the addition of new quality directories getting and deserving their pagerank, we also saw a drop in some of the strongest directories on the web. Why? It’s really unknown. Google decided to drop directories as Alive Directory, with almost 2,000,000 backlinks, from a Pagerank 7 to a Pagerank 6, while newer bidding directories, such as Web Directory Bid and Big Web Links gained new PR7 prestige. Not only did this shift leave me scratching my head, but I was also puzzled as to why some directories gained higher pagerank inner categories, such as Linkbook.org, which has a pagerank 4 homepage and almost all pagerank 6 inner pages. Is this a Google hiccup like last year’s April update? It doesn’t look like it as not longer after last year’s update, there was a correction. It should be interesting to see what happens with these particular sites in the upcoming July/August toolbar pagerank export.
Pagerank Prediction
Almost all directory owners are well aware of iwebtool’s vast array of webmaster tools. Within the toolset, iwebtool provides the coveted “Google Pagerank Prediction” tool. A very interesting tool to say the least, it’s most likely one of the most popular tools on iwebtool’s site because it gives webmasters and directory owner’s a look into the potential future of their sites pagerank. This glimpse of the future is highly inaccurate.
The problems with the Pagerank Prediction as a promotion tool:
Pagestrength
Pagestrength, a measurement tool to estimate the value of a website from various amounts of pulled data, was developed by SEOMoz.org. The tool had a lot of promise and webmasters really welcomed it as an alternative to pagerank. However, it may have been too popular. Bogged down by queries, the tool as well as the results struggled to pull data from sources and almost always needed to be refreshed. As the problems worsened, SEOMoz decided to limit 1 fetch per day or users could subscribe to their services for $39.00/month to get unlimited queries. This was highly unpopular move by SEOMoz and many of the loyal users were outraged at the switch. Many of them labeled SEOMoz as a part of the “Quick Buck Crew” by providing a faulty tool for such a steep price. It’s really a shame that such an interesting tool had a fast and ugly downfall. Which brings me to the next issue, Quick Buck Crews.
Quick Buck Crew aka “QBC”
By the title, it’s not hard to understand the latest webmaster label given to those owners who set up directories or other sites strictly to make a “quick buck”. This trend makes me angry. Almost daily do I see a thread with an absurb domain name used for a directory with a title “PR6 Toilet54 Web Directory - Submit Today!”.
So, I’ve come up with a list of ways to determine a QBC directory:
Sponsored Themes
This is another topic that I’ve been wanting to share my opinion on for some time now. To be honest, I love that designers are releasing quality themes for free use on a variety of different blogging or directory platforms. It’s bringing creativity and less homogeneity to both industries. However, what I’ve been noticing lately is the ridiculous amount of sponsored links in the footers of these templates.
Sponsored by: Bidding Directory ~ Casino Cash ~ Amish Settlers ~ Toilet54 Directory Designed by: X Designers Inc
Are you serious? Why in the world would I as a blogger or directory owner want to use your template if the entire footer is covered in links, which sometimes aren’t even related to the directory industry. This is a prime example of another version of the Quick Buck Crew.
To those who buy those spots:
What are you thinking? Yeah, it may be inexpensive to sponsor a theme for $50-$150, but You do know that you’re not getting your money’s worth by putting your link among 4 other links. Not to mention, the probability is pretty high that someone will download the theme, see all those links, and delete them because they want that for there own QBC footer links.
If you are going to sponsor a released theme, only sponsor up to 2 Links.
Sponsored by: Your Web Directory - Designed by: Web Designers
That is the safest and best way to go to insure your investment and the quality of that backlink.
Owner Clashes and Bickering
This is probably the most annoying trend now over at Digital Point. I’ve limited my reading and contributing there to a few threads and posts per day due to the constant complaining, bickering, childish activity that has engulfed the directory forums area. It all arised from mod development, dmoz submissions, and any other controversial issues that have been made apparent by some obnoxious members. Just an FYI, this activity isn’t helping anything and at best is allowing members to find other communities that don’t support the non-stop drama that is erupting from those handful of members.
Enough is enough already.
That’s what i’ve been thinking about lately, let me know your thoughts…
Very good read and spot on! Thanks for the sharing and you and I see eye to eye on everything you covered. I am especially keen on the “clashes and bickering” at DP. It’s a waste of my time to have to sort through all that mess. The forum might as well be full of spam posts. I can also say that you and I aren’t the only ones tired of the bickering/red repping/infractions and banning over there….I run Directory-Owners.com and we have seen a steady flow of ex DP’ers that are just as tired of the sh*t.
Again, thanks for sharing tom
I would like to further shrink the space of sponsors on footer links. It should be no more than ONE in any case. If you’ll put more then there are high chance that these links would be removed altogether by end user. {web developer}
Its very natural when there is success in any niche lot of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ people rush in. They add both good and bad to the existing niche. And one of the bad is ‘QBC’ and it get further worst when some reputed member with lot of green blobs and high number of posts {=good contribution to the community} starts a QBC styled site. And worst trend is that to avoid any conflict good members also doesn’t point their mistakes publicly to avoid it happen next though they encourage others to discourage them.
Overall good read out of you
@ Tom - It really has gotten out of hand and it’s good to see people creating resources outside of DP. Thanks for commenting.
@ Mong - I am on the same page with you as far as sponsored links are concerned. Personally, I’ve never sponsored a template because of the reasons I’ve mentioned above and the fact that you have no control of who has downloaded or sold links on the templates.
Hopefully we’ll see the QBC’s dwindle in the next year or so due to the publicity of the warning signs of those types of owners/directories/links/sites.
Thanks for your comments.
Very good points, especially about PS and iwebtool.
In the past few days, I don’t think I have read such a detail article any where. You have nicely ut all the point there.
Excellent work Nick
Thanks for the kind comments Mike and Fastian!
Great article. Some of you may know that I have decided to stop posting on DP. People have been allowed to be hurtful to perfectly good folks, as well as engage all sorts of unethical practices with with little of no oversight from the owners of DP. We can do better, and I encourage everyone to stop supporting a place like this until they take responsibility for their forum. I will try to stop by directory-owners.com as well as sitepoint.com
@ David - Thanks for reading. It’s a shame that happened with you and the community continues to get worse with the bickering, etc. With some moderation, Digital Point could regain it’s former glory, but, I don’t see that happening anytime soon.
[…] what happens with these particular sites in the upcoming July/August toolbar pagerank export. Read the rest of this article here __________________ — Nick Administrator Thanks for joining TalkDirectories! Please introduce […]
Very nice read there
Especially regarding the sponsord templates. The sponsor links can be very irrelevant linking to casino, pharma sites too!
You must be logged in to post a comment.